Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Oovernight delivery

Question: As old about long date but, deliveryman of pizza pie, I worry many people in this branch of industry are handicapped. If I include/understand well, the federal payments require that the drivers of delivery of pizza pie to being refunded at the federal rate pass from 50,5 hundreds by thousand for the whole of their deliveries, in more of gaining at least the minimum wage of Florida 6,79 $ the hour. Very little pizza pie-delivery places which I know to pay this type of refunding of mileage, if they pay any mileage of the whole. What federal right and Florida statement on this subject? Answer: The federal government Fair Labor Standards Act does not have mileage-refunding for the employers, and - except for California - it ya not of the state of the payments requiring these refundings for those which make at least the minimum wage, declared Bill Katsafanas, one hand-of?uvre And of employment with lawyer of Fisher & Phillips with Orlando. A possible exception would be if a company of delivery of pizza pie-under-paid a minimum wage, the claim of the "type of credit" allowed employers whose workers received a great part of their wages in the councils. Although little or not pizza pie-delivery places Florida to pay less than the minimum wage, those which would not be probably held to pay them 50,5-cent thousand with a refunding, Katsafanas known as. It melts that on the preceding decisions of the American department of Work in the two offices of Florida and Missouri. But for the drivers which are paid with the minimum wage ", I will go so far as to guess, they gain 3 $ the hour or more, the tips," Katsafanas known as. "With this income taken into account, even if one deduces refunding from mileage, it would be to you very little of chances to fall under the minimum wage." Do not ask. . How can the bad questions to obtain a maintenance of recruiting? Bad Pretty darn, according to a survey published this month the recruiting of 1000 frameworks and 3000 applicants for work. "Us have be shocked by what us have heard, that the recruiting of the managers posed of the questions which go from too personal to questions which are not only offensive, but illegal", declared Scott Erker, a spokesman of International Development Dimensions, a company of council which coparrainé the investigation with Monster Worldwide Inc The questions put by the managers of recruiting were collected in a certain number of categories. For example: * Illegal and inappropriate: "are you unmarried? Why not?" And "Why are you not yet married?" * Offensive and scandalous: "Would be you from time to time to see my children?" And "Would be you ready to spend the night with a customer, if they ask it?" * Too much personal: "do you Intend to have children?" And "is this the natural color of your hair?" * Odd and nonrelevant: "Which is your Beatle favourite?" And "What would make you if I gave you an elephant?" Although the investigation concentrated on the eradication of the worst questions, it also discovered examples of incredibly dumb comments by the applicants for work. With knowknowing: * "I am candidate for this station because I am about to be congédié." * "I made a dream and a fairy said to me that I should work for your company." * "I already accepted another position, but I thought that I could as well turn to the height of this interview right if it acted of an employment remunerated better." * "Please to excuse some of my answers, because I am hung still a little more as from this weekend." (This last remark, rather badly Monday, was made at the time of an interview Wednesday.)

No comments: